10 tools ranked · prices verified from official pages
Best AI Meeting Notes Tools in 2026
Every tool in this category promises the same thing: join the call, transcribe it, hand you a summary and action items. They mostly deliver. Where they differ, and where the money goes, is in the limits nobody puts on the marketing page.
Otter's free plan gives you 300 minutes a month but only three file imports for the lifetime of the account. Fellow's free tier sounds generous until you notice its 5 AI notes are a lifetime cap, not monthly. Notta caps free recordings at three minutes each, which is not a meeting. Grain does not publish its Starter price at all.
So this ranking is built on the numbers that decide whether a tool survives contact with your actual week.
Four things decided the order, applied identically to all twelve:
What the free tier really allows. Not "has a free plan" but the cap that bites first, minutes, meetings, imports, or history. A lifetime cap is treated as no free tier for ongoing use.
Entry price against the category. The cheapest real paid plan, per user, per month. In this niche the working range is $11–$29, so anything at the top of it has to justify the gap.
Recording model. Whether a bot joins the call, whether audio is retained for playback, and whether participants can tell. This is a compliance question, not a feature question.
Failure modes we could document. Transcription accuracy on accents and crosstalk, timestamp bugs, billing friction, sourced, not assumed.
Scores use the site-wide six criteria and published weights (how we rate). Placement cannot be bought, and most tools here have no affiliate programme at all.
Fireflies wins on the thing that matters after month three: retrieval. Transcripts across Zoom, Teams and Meet land in one searchable archive, and the free plan keeps 400 minutes of storage per team with unlimited transcription and summaries, the only free tier here that does not meter the summaries themselves. Paid starts at $18/mo, mid-range for the category.
The weakness is speaker identification: unless people state their name aloud, you get labelled-but-guessed speakers, and accuracy drops on crosstalk. If your calls are two people, that barely matters. If they are eight-person planning sessions, budget time for cleanup.
Entry price
Free plan · from $18/mo
Free tier
400 minutes of storage per team, unlimited transcription and summaries, 20 AI credits
Platforms
web, mobile, browser-extension, plugin, api
Checked
August 2026
Where it falls short
Speaker identification is weak unless each speaker states their name aloud
Transcription accuracy drops noticeably with background noise, accents or crosstalk
Fathom gives away what most rivals meter: unlimited recordings, transcripts and clips on the free plan, with only the advanced AI summaries limited. For solo consultants and founders that is often the whole job done for nothing.
Two caveats. Paid entry is $19/mo, slightly above Fireflies for a narrower archive story. And we found reports of timestamp bugs where multi-hour calls are mis-marked as a few minutes long, annoying when you are trying to jump back to a decision made at minute 80.
Entry price
Free plan · from $19/mo
Free tier
Unlimited recordings/transcripts/clips; advanced AI summary generation is limited on the free tier
Platforms
desktop, web, plugin, api
Checked
August 2026
Where it falls short
Reported timestamp bugs where multi-hour calls are mis-marked as only a few minutes long
No straightforward way to selectively record on mobile Zoom/Meet - must start from desktop
Otter is the name everyone knows, and it earns the maturity score: launched in 2016, broad language support, live in-call transcription that is genuinely useful while the meeting is happening rather than after.
It ranks third because of how it treats existing users. Plan limits and pricing changed repeatedly through 2024–2025, drawing sustained 'shrinkflation' complaints, and the current free tier is 300 minutes a month but only three file imports, ever. At $16.99/mo it is not the cheapest either. Strong product, weakest trust record in the top five.
Granola is the contrarian pick: it does not send a bot into your call. It listens on your machine and merges what you typed with what was said, which sidesteps the entire "who is that participant?" problem and the compliance conversation that follows.
The trade-off is absolute: there is no recording and no playback, transcript and notes only. If your team ever needs to re-listen to a disputed call, this is the wrong tool. At $14/mo it is also cheap, though the free tier's history limit is not stated as a number, which we count against it.
Entry price
Free plan · from $14/mo
Free tier
Limited meeting history (exact number of meetings/months not disclosed on pricing page)
Platforms
desktop, web
Checked
August 2026
Where it falls short
Doesn't actually record audio/video - no playback exists, only transcript + notes, which limits verification of what was said
Transcripts show as continuous text without reliable speaker labels once more than 2-3 people are in the meeting
Fellow treats the meeting as the unit of work, agendas before, notes during, action items after, with AI recording attached rather than central. Teams trying to fix how they meet get more from it than teams that just want a transcript, and at $11/mo it is the cheapest paid entry in this ranking.
Its free plan is the most misleading here: 5 AI notes and 5 AI recordings per user, lifetime. Read that as a demo, not a tier.
Entry price
Free plan · from $11/mo
Free tier
5 AI notes and 5 AI recordings total per user, lifetime (not monthly)
Platforms
web, desktop, mobile, plugin, api
Checked
August 2026
Where it falls short
Free tier's 5 AI notes/recordings are a lifetime cap, not monthly, making it unusable for ongoing free use
UI described as 'clunky' even after a recent refresh, with users occasionally viewing notes from the wrong recurring meeting instance
Best for engagement analytics on top of transcripts
Freemium6.9/10
Read.ai adds sentiment and engagement scoring across video calls, so you get a read on whether the room was with you, not only what was said. That is genuinely differentiated and useful for sales coaching.
It sits mid-table because of recurring privacy complaints: the bot joins calendar-based meetings three to five minutes early, which repeatedly surprises participants. Free tier is 5 transcripts and 5 reports a month, one hour max per meeting; paid is $19.75/mo.
Serious, recurring privacy complaints: the bot joins meetings 3-5 minutes early based on calendar events, and other attendees may never have consented to recording
Sentiment analysis is frequently called 'tone-deaf', flagging casual or joking conversations as 'Sentiment: Poor' and risking damaged working relationships
tl;dv covers a wide language range and is built around clipping moments out of calls for sharing, which fits product research and sales review workflows.
The free plan is the catch: unlimited recordings, but only 10 fully AI-noted meetings a month, after that you get the first 10 minutes of each. Paid entry is $29/mo, the joint-highest here, so the value case depends entirely on whether you use the clip workflow.
Entry price
Free plan · from $29/mo
Free tier
Unlimited recordings but only 10 AI-noted meetings/month in full, then only first 10 minutes/meeting auto-noted; recordings archived after 3 days
Platforms
web, browser-extension, plugin, api
Checked
August 2026
Where it falls short
Free plan's AI note-taking drops to only the first 10 minutes per meeting after your first 10 meetings
Recording bot can join calls uninvited, forcing hosts to remove it or explain unexpected recording to guests
Best for cheap paid transcription in many languages
Freemium6.1/10
Notta's paid plan is the cheapest real entry point in the category at $13.61/mo, with strong multilingual coverage, and that is the reason to pick it.
Its free plan should be ignored: 120 minutes a month sounds fine until you hit the three-minute cap per recording. That is not a meeting-notes tool, it is a voice-memo tool.
Entry price
Free plan · from $13.61/mo
Free tier
120 min/month transcription, 3 minutes max per recording, 50 uploads/month, 10 AI summaries/month
Platforms
web, mobile, desktop, browser-extension, api
Checked
August 2026
Where it falls short
Free plan's 3-minute-per-recording cap makes it impractical for any real meeting or interview
Widespread, serious complaints of deceptive billing: users report being charged the full annual fee after a short trial with no warning, and difficulty getting refunds
Laxis is built for customer-facing teams: notes flow toward the CRM rather than a document archive, which is the right shape for account managers. $15.99/mo paid, 300 free minutes a month with 30-day history.
It ranks low on reach, not quality, it is primarily a Chrome extension, so anyone on Safari or Firefox is out.
Entry price
Free plan · from $15.99/mo
Free tier
300 transcription minutes/month, 30-day conversation history
Platforms
web, browser-extension, plugin, api
Checked
August 2026
Where it falls short
Primarily a Chrome extension, which limits usability for non-Chrome browser users
Reliability issues reported on long calls, plus a default setting that auto-shares summaries with all attendees, raising privacy concerns
Best for revenue teams that want coaching built in
Paid6.9/10
Avoma goes past note-taking into conversation intelligence: deal and coaching analytics on top of the transcript, aimed squarely at sales and customer success organisations.
It is last on this list because of the entry barrier, not the product. There is no free tier, a 14-day trial, then $29/mo, which makes it a deliberate purchase for a revenue team, not something an individual tries on a Tuesday. Sembly ($17/mo, also no free plan) is the cheaper way into the same idea.
Entry price
From $29/mo
Free tier
No free tier
Platforms
web, plugin, api
Checked
August 2026
Where it falls short
No genuine free tier for recording/transcribing - cheapest path in is a 14-day trial, then $29+/seat
One review analysis reported 73% of a 500+ review sample flagged reliability issues (bot drop-offs, late joins, misidentified speakers)
Working alone: start on Fathom's free plan and stop there until something breaks. Nothing else gives unlimited recording for nothing.
A small team that searches old calls: Fireflies at $18/mo. The archive and the free summaries are the whole argument.
A team with a compliance officer: Granola, because no bot joins the call and no audio is retained, then confirm that the lack of playback is acceptable before you roll it out.
A revenue org: Avoma or Sembly. You are buying coaching analytics, not notes, and both price accordingly.
The limit that catches people out
Across twelve tools, the free-tier caps fall into three groups: monthly allowances you can plan around (Fireflies, Otter, Laxis, Read.ai), lifetime allowances that expire in days (Fellow's 5 notes, Otter's 3 imports), and per-recording caps that rule out real meetings (Notta's three minutes). Only Fathom avoids all three.
Prices moved twice in this category during the past year, in both cases downward in what the free plan includes rather than upward in headline price. That is why every number here carries the month it was checked, and why the verification log is public.
Questions people ask
Do AI meeting note takers need permission to record?
In most jurisdictions yes, and several of these tools join calls as a visible participant precisely so that consent is obvious. Read.ai's bot joining three to five minutes early is a repeated source of complaints for exactly this reason. If consent is a hard requirement in your setting, Granola avoids the problem by not joining calls at all, it listens locally and keeps no recording.
Which free plan lasts longest in real use?
Fathom, by a wide margin: unlimited recordings and transcripts, with only advanced summaries limited. Fireflies is second because its free tier includes summaries, capped by 400 minutes of team storage rather than a monthly counter.
Is the cheapest paid plan good enough?
Usually. Fellow at $11/mo and Notta at $13.61/mo cover recording, transcription and summaries. You pay more for retrieval across a large archive (Fireflies) or for coaching analytics (Avoma, Sembly), not for better transcription.
How accurate are the transcripts?
Good on clear single-speaker audio, noticeably worse on accents, crosstalk and technical jargon, a limitation we found documented for Otter and Fireflies alike. Speaker labelling is the weakest part across the category: Fireflies in particular guesses badly unless people say their names.
How often are these prices re-checked?
Every price here was read from the vendor's own pricing page in August 2026, and each tool page shows its own verification month. This category changes plan limits more often than headline prices, so check the free-tier caps before committing.
Also in this category
Did not make the ranking, but worth a look depending on your case.