What Fellow does

Fellow combines shared meeting agendas, AI-generated notes/recordings and cross-meeting action-item tracking, oriented around recurring management rituals (1:1s, team syncs, all-hands) rather than one-off call transcription alone.

What you get: Shared meeting agendas, AI notes/recording, cross-meeting action items, 1:1 meeting templates, manager toolkits.

Typical jobs: Recurring 1:1s between managers and reports; team sync agendas with tracked action items; all-hands meeting documentation.

Worth knowing: fellow.app/pricing redirects to fellow.ai/pricing; free tier limits are lifetime caps, not monthly, which is easy to miss when comparing to competitors.

What users complain about: UI is described as clunky sometimes even after a recent refresh, with users occasionally viewing notes from the wrong recurring meeting (alternatives.co Fellow App reviews)

Pricing and plan limits

Verified August 2026

Plan	Monthly	Annual (per mo)	Limits
Free	Free	Free	5 AI notes (lifetime) and 5 AI recordings (lifetime) per user
Team	$11	$7	10 AI notes/user/month; 10 AI recordings/user/month
Business	$23	$15	Unlimited AI notes and recordings per user
Enterprise	not disclosed	$25	Annual billing only; minimum 10 users; unlimited AI notes/recordings

Where it wins

Purpose-built for recurring management rituals (1:1s, team syncs) rather than just one-off call transcripts
Combines agenda-setting before the meeting with AI notes after, closing the loop other pure-transcription tools miss
Long track record in the meeting-productivity space with an established feature set

Where it falls short

Free tier's 5 AI notes/recordings are a lifetime cap, not monthly, making it unusable for ongoing free use
UI described as 'clunky' even after a recent refresh, with users occasionally viewing notes from the wrong recurring meeting instance
Transcription accuracy is inconsistent enough that some users report confusion in downstream task management
Searching and retrieving past meeting notes is reported as frustrating and inefficient

How we scored it

Full methodology

Criterion	Weight	Score	Contribution
Capability	30%	7.0	2.10
Value for money	25%	6.5	1.63
Ease of use	15%	7.5	1.13
Maturity	15%	7.5	1.13
Support & docs	10%	7.0	0.70
Momentum	5%	5.5	0.28
Weighted total	100%	7.0	7.00